In habeas corpus proceedings, a petitioner presents evidence and argument that his or her constitutional rights were violated at trial. Because there are infinite ways for state actors to violate the Constitution, there is no complete checklist for the competent investigation of claims in post-conviction proceedings. However, certain claims are commonly investigated and regularly provide basis for relief.

The links above contain summaries of cases that support these commonly addressed claims. If you know of other successful cases not included on this website, please contact HAT.